Ken

Who are GTM engineers, and where do they come from?

Mostly go-to-market people who learned to build, not software engineers. The title grew 6.5x, from 121 holders at the end of 2023 to 791 in March 2026, and 7.7% came from software or data engineering.

Cristian Frunze
Founder of Ken 5 min read
Methodology (PDF)

Key findings

  • 6.5x

    growth in people holding a GTM engineer title, from 121 at the end of 2023 to 791 in March 2026, while sales and marketing headcount stayed flat.

  • 7.7%

    of new GTM engineers came straight from software or data engineering. Sales roles, marketing, ops and founder jobs each supplied more.

  • 19.3%

    of GTM engineers list Clay on their profile, against 0.2% of RevOps people. 26.6% mention AI tools, against 3.0% of SDRs.

  • 67.8%

    work at companies with 200 or fewer employees, against 39.2% of people hired as SDRs since 2024. Only 9.7% work at companies over 1,000.

On this page

The number of people holding a GTM engineer title grew 6.5 times in just over two years: 121 people held one at the end of 2023, and 791 did in March 2026. Seven in ten people who have ever held the title (714 of 1,028) started it in 2025 or later. The sales and marketing workforce around them barely moved, so this is real growth, not more profiles.

A GTM (go-to-market) engineer builds the systems a sales and marketing team runs on: enriched lead lists, automated outbound, CRM workflows and the scripts that join the tools together. Many B2B teams are hiring for the role, and few have defined it with data. We looked at the work histories of everyone in Ken internal data who holds or has held the title, in the US, the UK, Canada, Australia, Ireland and New Zealand.

Figure 1GTM engineers grew 6.5x after 2023 and passed growth engineers in 2025
  • GTM engineer
  • Growth engineer
GTM engineers grew 6.5x after 2023 and passed growth engineers in 2025Line chart from 2022 Q2 to 2026 Q1. GTM engineers rise from 52 to 121 at the end of 2023, 250 at the end of 2024, 636 at the end of 2025 and 791 in March 2026. Growth engineers move from 246 to 392 and are overtaken in 2025 Q1.People holding the title02004006008002022 Q22023 Q32024 Q42026 Q1Quarter endGTM engineer · 2022 Q2: 52GTM engineer · 2022 Q3: 56GTM engineer · 2022 Q4: 58GTM engineer · 2023 Q1: 78GTM engineer · 2023 Q2: 89GTM engineer · 2023 Q3: 105GTM engineer · 2023 Q4: 121GTM engineer · 2024 Q1: 152GTM engineer · 2024 Q2: 166GTM engineer · 2024 Q3: 213GTM engineer · 2024 Q4: 250GTM engineer · 2025 Q1: 324GTM engineer · 2025 Q2: 412GTM engineer · 2025 Q3: 542GTM engineer · 2025 Q4: 636GTM engineer · 2026 Q1: 791Growth engineer · 2022 Q2: 246Growth engineer · 2022 Q3: 241Growth engineer · 2022 Q4: 235Growth engineer · 2023 Q1: 243Growth engineer · 2023 Q2: 245Growth engineer · 2023 Q3: 242Growth engineer · 2023 Q4: 240Growth engineer · 2024 Q1: 233Growth engineer · 2024 Q2: 248Growth engineer · 2024 Q3: 263Growth engineer · 2024 Q4: 269Growth engineer · 2025 Q1: 290Growth engineer · 2025 Q2: 342Growth engineer · 2025 Q3: 370Growth engineer · 2025 Q4: 376Growth engineer · 2026 Q1: 392121 at the end of 2023791392
  • GTM engineer
  • Growth engineer
GTM engineers grew 6.5x after 2023 and passed growth engineers in 2025Line chart from 2022 Q2 to 2026 Q1. GTM engineers rise from 52 to 121 at the end of 2023, 250 at the end of 2024, 636 at the end of 2025 and 791 in March 2026. Growth engineers move from 246 to 392 and are overtaken in 2025 Q1.People holding the title02004006008002022 Q22022 Q42023 Q22023 Q42024 Q22024 Q42025 Q22026 Q1Quarter endGTM engineer · 2022 Q2: 52GTM engineer · 2022 Q3: 56GTM engineer · 2022 Q4: 58GTM engineer · 2023 Q1: 78GTM engineer · 2023 Q2: 89GTM engineer · 2023 Q3: 105GTM engineer · 2023 Q4: 121GTM engineer · 2024 Q1: 152GTM engineer · 2024 Q2: 166GTM engineer · 2024 Q3: 213GTM engineer · 2024 Q4: 250GTM engineer · 2025 Q1: 324GTM engineer · 2025 Q2: 412GTM engineer · 2025 Q3: 542GTM engineer · 2025 Q4: 636GTM engineer · 2026 Q1: 791Growth engineer · 2022 Q2: 246Growth engineer · 2022 Q3: 241Growth engineer · 2022 Q4: 235Growth engineer · 2023 Q1: 243Growth engineer · 2023 Q2: 245Growth engineer · 2023 Q3: 242Growth engineer · 2023 Q4: 240Growth engineer · 2024 Q1: 233Growth engineer · 2024 Q2: 248Growth engineer · 2024 Q3: 263Growth engineer · 2024 Q4: 269Growth engineer · 2025 Q1: 290Growth engineer · 2025 Q2: 342Growth engineer · 2025 Q3: 370Growth engineer · 2025 Q4: 376Growth engineer · 2026 Q1: 392121 at the end of 2023791392

People holding a GTM engineer title, and the older growth engineer title, at each quarter end. Before mid-2022 fewer than 50 people held a GTM engineer title, so earlier quarters are not shown. March 2026 may still be missing late profile updates.

Source: Ken internal data (company and career records Ken uses for sales and outreach), analysed by Cristian Frunze.

Show the data
Data for figure 1: GTM engineers grew 6.5x after 2023 and passed growth engineers in 2025
Quarter endGTM engineerGrowth engineer
2022 Q252246
2022 Q356241
2022 Q458235
2023 Q178243
2023 Q289245
2023 Q3105242
2023 Q4121240
2024 Q1152233
2024 Q2166248
2024 Q3213263
2024 Q4250269
2025 Q1324290
2025 Q2412342
2025 Q3542370
2025 Q4636376
2026 Q1791392

From a niche title to 791 people

The title existed before 2024, but barely: it first passed 50 people in mid-2022. It doubled during 2024, from 121 to 250 people, then grew 2.54 times during 2025, to 636. In the first three months of 2026 alone, 196 people started their first GTM engineer job.

It is still a rare title: about 0.95 for every 10,000 people in sales and marketing jobs, up from 0.15 at the end of 2023. That workforce went from 8,204,748 to 8,306,164 people over the same period, so the share grew 6.5 times too.

"Growth engineer" makes a useful contrast. It is an older product-engineering title, for engineers who run in-app growth experiments, and it comes from the same profiles. It grew 1.63 times over the same period, from 240 to 392 people, and GTM engineer overtook it in early 2025.

We counted titles built on "GTM engineer" or "go-to-market engineer", with seniority and modifier forms such as "Senior GTM Engineer", "Head of GTM Engineering" and "GTM Systems Engineer". Adding revenue and RevOps engineer titles takes March 2026 from 791 to 868 people. Recruiters who hire GTM engineers and two unrelated "GTM"s, Oracle's Global Trade Management and F5's Global Traffic Manager, were removed before counting.

Most came from go-to-market jobs, not engineering

There is no single feeder job. For the 999 people with an earlier job, we looked at the one held just before their first GTM engineer title.

Figure 2Most came from go-to-market jobs, not engineering
Most came from go-to-market jobs, not engineeringBar chart. GTM sales roles 19.8%, marketing 14.2%, engineering, data and product 11.0%, founders, consultants and agencies 9.9%, RevOps and other ops 9.6%, other GTM roles 6.1%, other jobs 29.3%.0%10%20%30%New GTM engineers with an earlier job (%)GTM sales rolesGTM sales roles · Share of new GTM engineers: 19.8%19.8%MarketingMarketing · Share of new GTM engineers: 14.2%14.2%Engineering, data, productEngineering, data, product · Share of new GTM engineers: 11.0%11.0%Founders, consultantsFounders, consultants · Share of new GTM engineers: 9.9%9.9%RevOps, sales and marketing opsRevOps, sales and marketing ops · Share of new GTM engineers: 9.6%9.6%Other GTM rolesOther GTM roles · Share of new GTM engineers: 6.1%6.1%Other jobsOther jobs · Share of new GTM engineers: 29.3%29.3%
Most came from go-to-market jobs, not engineeringBar chart. GTM sales roles 19.8%, marketing 14.2%, engineering, data and product 11.0%, founders, consultants and agencies 9.9%, RevOps and other ops 9.6%, other GTM roles 6.1%, other jobs 29.3%.0%10%20%30%New GTM engineers with an earlier job (%)GTM sales rolesGTM sales roles · Share of new GTM engineers: 19.8%19.8%MarketingMarketing · Share of new GTM engineers: 14.2%14.2%Engineering,data, productEngineering, data, product · Share of new GTM engineers: 11.0%11.0%Founders, consultantsFounders, consultants · Share of new GTM engineers: 9.9%9.9%RevOps, salesand marketing opsRevOps, sales and marketing ops · Share of new GTM engineers: 9.6%9.6%Other GTM rolesOther GTM roles · Share of new GTM engineers: 6.1%6.1%Other jobsOther jobs · Share of new GTM engineers: 29.3%29.3%

Job held just before the first GTM engineer title, for the 999 people with an earlier job. Go-to-market jobs are in purple. Software and data engineers, 7.7% of the total, are part of engineering, data and product.

Source: Ken internal data (company and career records Ken uses for sales and outreach), analysed by Cristian Frunze.

Show the data
Data for figure 2: Most came from go-to-market jobs, not engineering
Share of new GTM engineers
GTM sales roles19.8%
Marketing14.2%
Engineering, data, product11.0%
Founders, consultants9.9%
RevOps, sales and marketing ops9.6%
Other GTM roles6.1%
Other jobs29.3%

GTM sales roles (SDRs, account executives, account managers, customer success and presales) supplied the most, 19.8%, then marketing at 14.2%. Engineering, data and product supplied 11.0%, and software and data engineers alone 7.7% (77 people). The remaining 29.3% came from a long tail of other jobs.

So the role is filled mostly by go-to-market people who learned to build, not by software engineers who moved into sales. 14.9% (149 of 999) took the job inside the company where they already worked, and 94 of 1,028 first held the title as a founder, freelancer, fractional hire or agency owner.

What is on their profiles

We compared the 792 current GTM engineers with people who started an SDR or RevOps job in the same years: 60,823 SDRs and 51,490 RevOps people. For each group, we counted how many profiles mention a tool.

Figure 3Clay, code and AI set GTM engineers apart from RevOps
  • GTM engineers
  • RevOps
Clay, code and AI set GTM engineers apart from RevOpsGrouped bar chart. GTM engineers against RevOps: Clay 19.3% vs 0.2%, AI and LLM tools 26.6% vs 2.5%, SQL 24.2% vs 10.5%, Salesforce 23.5% vs 27.4%, Python 18.9% vs 4.3%, HubSpot 18.4% vs 5.4%, APIs and webhooks 14.4% vs 1.9%.0%10%20%30%Profiles that mention the tool (%)ClayClay · GTM engineers: 19.3%19.3%Clay · RevOps: 0.2%0.2%AI and LLM toolsAI and LLM tools · GTM engineers: 26.6%26.6%AI and LLM tools · RevOps: 2.5%2.5%SQLSQL · GTM engineers: 24.2%24.2%SQL · RevOps: 10.5%10.5%SalesforceSalesforce · GTM engineers: 23.5%23.5%Salesforce · RevOps: 27.4%27.4%PythonPython · GTM engineers: 18.9%18.9%Python · RevOps: 4.3%4.3%HubSpotHubSpot · GTM engineers: 18.4%18.4%HubSpot · RevOps: 5.4%5.4%APIs and webhooksAPIs and webhooks · GTM engineers: 14.4%14.4%APIs and webhooks · RevOps: 1.9%1.9%
  • GTM engineers
  • RevOps
Clay, code and AI set GTM engineers apart from RevOpsGrouped bar chart. GTM engineers against RevOps: Clay 19.3% vs 0.2%, AI and LLM tools 26.6% vs 2.5%, SQL 24.2% vs 10.5%, Salesforce 23.5% vs 27.4%, Python 18.9% vs 4.3%, HubSpot 18.4% vs 5.4%, APIs and webhooks 14.4% vs 1.9%.0%10%20%30%Profiles that mention the tool (%)ClayClay · GTM engineers: 19.3%19.3%Clay · RevOps: 0.2%0.2%AI and LLM toolsAI and LLM tools · GTM engineers: 26.6%26.6%AI and LLM tools · RevOps: 2.5%2.5%SQLSQL · GTM engineers: 24.2%24.2%SQL · RevOps: 10.5%10.5%SalesforceSalesforce · GTM engineers: 23.5%23.5%Salesforce · RevOps: 27.4%27.4%PythonPython · GTM engineers: 18.9%18.9%Python · RevOps: 4.3%4.3%HubSpotHubSpot · GTM engineers: 18.4%18.4%HubSpot · RevOps: 5.4%5.4%APIs and webhooksAPIs and webhooks · GTM engineers: 14.4%14.4%APIs and webhooks · RevOps: 1.9%1.9%

Share of profiles that mention each tool in their skills or headline: 792 current GTM engineers and 51,490 people who started a RevOps job in 2024 or later. Fewer than 50 of 60,823 comparable SDRs mention Clay.

Source: Ken internal data (company and career records Ken uses for sales and outreach), analysed by Cristian Frunze.

Show the data
Data for figure 3: Clay, code and AI set GTM engineers apart from RevOps
GTM engineersRevOps
Clay19.3%0.2%
AI and LLM tools26.6%2.5%
SQL24.2%10.5%
Salesforce23.5%27.4%
Python18.9%4.3%
HubSpot18.4%5.4%
APIs and webhooks14.4%1.9%
  • Clay, the data-enrichment and automation tool, is on 19.3% of GTM engineer profiles. It is on 0.2% of RevOps profiles and on fewer than 50 of the 60,823 SDR profiles.
  • Code: Python is on 18.9% of GTM engineer profiles against 4.3% of RevOps, SQL on 24.2% against 10.5%, and APIs and webhooks on 14.4% against 1.9%.
  • AI: 26.6% of GTM engineers mention AI or LLM tools such as ChatGPT, OpenAI or Claude, against 3.0% of SDRs and 2.5% of RevOps.
  • CRM: Salesforce is close to the RevOps rate (23.5% against 27.4%). HubSpot is far more common (18.4% against 5.4%), which fits the smaller companies that hire GTM engineers.

The sales-engagement tools SDRs list, such as Apollo, Outreach, Salesloft and ZoomInfo, are each on fewer than 50 GTM engineer profiles. The role looks more like a technical RevOps person than a seller. GTM engineer profiles carry more skill keywords overall, but neutral ones such as management and communication sit near the RevOps rate, so the tool gaps are not a profile-length effect.

Small, young, venture-backed employers

Among current GTM engineers whose employer we could match, compared with people hired as SDRs from January 2024 to March 2026:

Figure 4GTM engineers work at smaller, younger companies than new SDRs
  • GTM engineers
  • SDR hires
GTM engineers work at smaller, younger companies than new SDRsGrouped bar chart. GTM engineers against SDR hires: 200 or fewer employees 67.8% vs 39.2%, over 1,000 employees 9.7% vs 35.9%, software and IT 67.7% vs 53.2%, venture round on record 37.3% vs 24.3%, founded 2015 or later 75.6% vs 36.1%.0%20%40%60%80%Share of people (%)200 or fewer employees200 or fewer employees · GTM engineers: 67.8%67.8%200 or fewer employees · SDR hires: 39.2%39.2%Over 1,000 employeesOver 1,000 employees · GTM engineers: 9.7%9.7%Over 1,000 employees · SDR hires: 35.9%35.9%Software and ITSoftware and IT · GTM engineers: 67.7%67.7%Software and IT · SDR hires: 53.2%53.2%Venture round on recordVenture round on record · GTM engineers: 37.3%37.3%Venture round on record · SDR hires: 24.3%24.3%Founded 2015 or laterFounded 2015 or later · GTM engineers: 75.6%75.6%Founded 2015 or later · SDR hires: 36.1%36.1%
  • GTM engineers
  • SDR hires
GTM engineers work at smaller, younger companies than new SDRsGrouped bar chart. GTM engineers against SDR hires: 200 or fewer employees 67.8% vs 39.2%, over 1,000 employees 9.7% vs 35.9%, software and IT 67.7% vs 53.2%, venture round on record 37.3% vs 24.3%, founded 2015 or later 75.6% vs 36.1%.0%20%40%60%80%Share of people (%)200 or fewer employees200 or fewer employees · GTM engineers: 67.8%67.8%200 or fewer employees · SDR hires: 39.2%39.2%Over 1,000 employeesOver 1,000 employees · GTM engineers: 9.7%9.7%Over 1,000 employees · SDR hires: 35.9%35.9%Software and ITSoftware and IT · GTM engineers: 67.7%67.7%Software and IT · SDR hires: 53.2%53.2%Venture round on recordVenture round on record · GTM engineers: 37.3%37.3%Venture round on record · SDR hires: 24.3%24.3%Founded 2015 or laterFounded 2015 or later · GTM engineers: 75.6%75.6%Founded 2015 or later · SDR hires: 36.1%36.1%

Share of current GTM engineers (March 2026) and of people hired as SDRs from January 2024 to March 2026, by their employer's company record. Each share uses the people whose employer record has that field, such as 566 GTM engineers for size.

Source: Ken internal data (company and career records Ken uses for sales and outreach), analysed by Cristian Frunze.

Show the data
Data for figure 4: GTM engineers work at smaller, younger companies than new SDRs
GTM engineersSDR hires
200 or fewer employees67.8%39.2%
Over 1,000 employees9.7%35.9%
Software and IT67.7%53.2%
Venture round on record37.3%24.3%
Founded 2015 or later75.6%36.1%

67.8% work at companies with 200 or fewer employees, against 39.2% of SDR hires, and only 9.7% at companies with more than 1,000 employees, against 35.9%. The median employer is 7 years old, against 15 for SDR hires.

What we expected

We wrote down four predictions before pulling any data.

  • At least tenfold growth. Partly right: 6.5x, between the tenfold we expected and the fivefold line we set for being wrong. Most holders did start in 2025 or later.
  • Mostly from ops and sales roles, under 20% from engineering. Half right. Software and data engineering was 7.7%. But ops, SDR/BDR and other sales roles together supplied 24.0%, not more than half.
  • Clay at least 5 times as common as among SDRs and RevOps, code at least 3 times the RevOps rate, CRM about the same. Mostly right. Clay is 114.3 times the RevOps rate. Python (4.4x) and APIs (7.7x) cleared 3x, SQL (2.3x) did not. Salesforce matched (0.9x), HubSpot did not (3.4x).
  • Small, venture-backed software companies hire most of them. Right on size, industry and venture funding.

What this data cannot show

  • Titles, not tasks. Some RevOps and growth people do GTM engineering under another title and are not counted.
  • Late updates. People add new jobs months late, so March 2026 may undercount and the 6.5x is likely a lower bound.
  • Retitling. Someone may have relabelled an earlier job after the term caught on. We cannot see when a title was written.
  • Coverage. The data covers six English-speaking countries and profiles that exist today, and only 566 of the 791 current GTM engineers have a matched company record with a size.
  • Description, not cause. These are patterns in public profiles, not proof of what causes what.

What it means for B2B teams

  • The pool is thin. With about one GTM engineer per 10,000 sales and marketing workers, most teams will not find experienced ones to hire. Plan to grow them.
  • Look inside go-to-market first. Only 7.7% came from software or data engineering. Sales reps, marketers, ops people and founders who already automate their own work are the likeliest candidates, and 14.9% made the move inside their own company.
  • Screen for the stack, not the title. Clay, Python, SQL, APIs and AI tools on top of a CRM are what set the role apart.
  • Large companies are early. Only 9.7% of GTM engineers work at companies over 1,000 employees, against 35.9% of new SDRs.

Data and method

Data
Ken internal data: the public professional profiles, work histories, skill keywords and company records Ken uses for sales and outreach, reused by Cristian Frunze for this study. Six countries: the US, the UK, Canada, Australia, Ireland and New Zealand.
Sample
1,028 people who have held a GTM engineer title (791 in March 2026), compared with 60,823 SDRs, 51,490 RevOps people and the 8,306,164 people in sales and marketing jobs in March 2026.
Date range
Quarter ends from 2019 Q1 to 2026 Q1, from profiles updated up to April 2026. Growth measured from the end of 2023.
Method
Pre-registered. Title rules with a manual audit of 200 titles per tier, quarterly headcount from job start and end dates, previous-role analysis, and tool mentions compared across groups. Headline numbers recomputed by an independent analysis.
Excluded
  • Recruiters hiring for the role, Oracle and F5 "GTM" product titles, and unrelated revenue or growth engineers
  • Presales engineers, and titles such as "Software Engineer, GTM"
  • Jobs with no start date
  • Any group under 50 people
Privacy
Aggregates only. Any group smaller than 50 people is suppressed, and no individual is named.
All studies →

Put the data to work.

No card · Or we run it for you