Cold email grader
Paste a cold email and get a score out of 100, the reason behind every lost point and a rewrite. Roast mode if you can take it.
Start over
Under 60 is start overNothing here is about Jane or Northwind. Start over. The email is built entirely from claims about the sender and could be sent to any company with the name swapped. Replace the pitch with one specific observation about Northwind's outbound, cut it under 90 words, and drop the hype and the AI phrasing.
Six things a reply depends on
Each is scored on its own, the dial is the average.Where the points went
Numbers in the text match the numbered notes.Your email
8 marks, 26 rule points lostHi Jane,
I hope this email finds you well. My name is Tom and I'm the founder of Outbound Labs, a leading AI-powered platform that helps B2B companies like Northwind scale their outbound engine 10x with cutting-edge automation.
We've helped over 500 companies increase their pipeline by 300% in just 90 days, and I'd love to show you how we can do the same for you.
Would you be open to a quick 15-minute call this week or next to explore synergies? I can also send over a case study if that's easier.
Looking forward to hearing from you!
Best regards, Tom
The roast
Roast mode is on. Same rubric, no manners.Ken's rewrite
Written by Ken AIKept your offer and your name. Changed the rest.Hi Jane,
I saw Northwind is hiring a second SDR, which usually means the outbound load is outgrowing the team.
Tom here, founder of Outbound Labs. We take the list building and first-touch sending off your reps' plates so they can spend the day on replies instead of prospecting.
Happy to walk you through it on a 15-minute call this week or next. What does your Thursday look like?
Best regards, Tom
Share the score
The card shows the score, the rubric and a one-line verdict. Never the email.Next
What the cold email grader checks
Paste a cold email with the subject on the first line, and optionally who it's for. The grader scores it from 0 to 100, tells you to keep it, rewrite it or start over, and marks every line that lost points.
Two kinds of checks run on the same email:
- Ken's copy rubric, answered the way a busy buyer reads. Can you understand it on one skim? Does it sound like a person? Are the offer and the ask obvious? How clear is the call to action? Is the P.S. clear? Would you reply? Is there a phrase nobody would say out loud? Plus two more for a pasted email: is it relevant to this reader, and is anything in it true only of them?
- Rule checks that need no model and run in your browser: spam words by tier, ALL CAPS and stacked punctuation, links and URL shorteners, a fake Re: or Fwd: in the subject, unfilled merge fields like {{first_name}}, length, reading level, the phrases that make copy read as AI, and the subject line itself.
How the score is built
The dial is the average of six scores, each out of 100:
- Relevance and personalization come from the rubric.
- Call to action is the rubric's ask score, with the P.S. counted for a quarter when there is one.
- Length scores the word count. First touches that get replies sit between 50 and 90 words.
- Deliverability takes 3 points for every rule point lost on spam words, formatting, links, a fake reply prefix, placeholders and the subject.
- Readability blends the rubric's quick-read and sounds-like-a-person scores with the reading grade and the AI-tell check.
80 and up is keep, 60 to 79 is rewrite, under 60 is start over. If the model is busy or you've used today's free grades, the page still shows the rule checks and a rules-only score.
How to fix a low-scoring cold email
Most low scores come from a handful of habits:
- The ask is missing, doubled or buried. End with one plain ask for the real offer: the call, the demo or the sample.
- The email is about you. Open with something true about their company, then say why it made you write.
- Brochure words. If you wouldn't say the sentence across a table, rewrite it until you would.
- It's too long. Cut the paragraph that repeats the one before it. A cold email is a note, not a pitch deck.
- The subject reads like marketing. Use a few plain words with no punctuation, the way you'd title a note to a colleague.
Grade it again after each pass. Ken's rewrite drafts a new version on the same offer, and marks in purple every fact it had to assume, so you confirm it before it goes anywhere near a list.
Roast mode, the rewrite and the share card
Roast mode writes the same result as a blunt teardown. The checks and the score don't change, only the tone.
The rewrite follows Ken's copy rules: one person writing to one person, one idea, 50 to 90 words, plain text and one ask. It keeps your name, your offer and your merge fields, and it's graded the same way as your email, so you can see whether it's better.
The share card is an image of the score, the verdict and the six scores, ready for LinkedIn or X. Its link is signed, so nobody can put words on it, and it holds no part of your email.
Why grading matters before you send
A cold email gets one read. If the subject looks like a promotion it may never be opened, and if the first two lines don't say why you're writing, the reader archives it. You don't get that attention back for the follow-ups either.
Copy also feeds spam filtering. Gmail and Outlook lean mostly on sender reputation and authentication, but corporate gateways such as Proofpoint, Mimecast and Barracuda still score message content. A short, clear email with no spam words loses nothing on either side. Grading takes seconds. Learning the same lesson from 2,000 sends that got no replies takes weeks.